Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 +246%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117B
GPU Name
GM107
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net