NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 189W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+375%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
30
896
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
189W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GT200B
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
