NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+508%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
896
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GF100
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
