NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GRID K200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+29%
2.957 TFLOPS
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GK104
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
