NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1770MHz vs 1215MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000
+13%
16.31 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
14.31 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 6000
+39%
13758
RTX A4500 Embedded
9884
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
46
4608
Shading Units
5888
288
TMUs
184
96
ROPs
96
576
Tensor Cores
184
72
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GA104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
