Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 +24243%
16.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G84
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
42W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy