NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000
+612%
16.31 TFLOPS
GRID K2
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
1536
288
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
