Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +1296%
14.38 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
448
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GF100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy