NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000
+216%
11.15 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2496
192
TMUs
208
64
ROPs
40
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
230W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GK110
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
