Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1815MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +8679%
11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
48
192
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G94
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy