NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
+957%
10.87 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
14
3072
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GF100
N19E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
