Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1770MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +673%
10.87 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GM107
N19E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

110W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy