NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
Lower TDP (110W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
10.87 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+1%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
6144
192
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
10.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N19E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
