Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +612%
9.492 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

110W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy