Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1635MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
9.492 TFLOPS
A10M +146%
23.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
56
3072
Shading Units
7168
192
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
80
384
Tensor Cores
224
48
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net