NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1350MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+133%
8.294 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+270%
7677
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+281%
3588
Quadro K5200
941
Blender
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+406%
1484
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2304
192
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
259.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
259.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
