Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1545MHz vs 1530MHz)
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +120%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
5120
144
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
288
Tensor Cores
640
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GV100
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy