Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +24448%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
16
144
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G86
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
21W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy