NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
+1829%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
128
144
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
24
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
171W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
G80
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
