NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (2050MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+135%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1005 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
