Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1560MHz vs 1530MHz)
Lower TDP (110W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
7.987 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +96%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1110 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

40
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
5120
160
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
320
Tensor Cores
640
40
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

99.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
15.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
249.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GV100
N19E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

110W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy