NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
+430%
7.066 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
320
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
220.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
14.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.066 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
220.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
