NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1620MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
7.066 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
+111%
14.93 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
780 MHz
Base Clock
1230 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
72
2560
Shading Units
4608
160
TMUs
288
64
ROPs
96
320
Tensor Cores
576
40
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
220.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
14.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
220.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
