NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
+5991%
7.066 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
6
2560
Shading Units
48
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
320
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
220.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
14.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.066 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
220.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
