NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 188W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
+751%
5.299 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
30
1920
Shading Units
240
120
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GT200B
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
