NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
+144%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
1536
120
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK104
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
