NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1612MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
5.299 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+55%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
945 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
20
1920
Shading Units
2560
120
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
80
30
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GA107S
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
445 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
