NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+353%
4.666 TFLOPS
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
1920
Shading Units
448
120
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
