NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+715%
4.666 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+5310%
1623
Quadro K2000M
30
OctaneBench
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+183%
34
Quadro K2000M
12
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
384
120
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
