NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+909%
4.666 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
24
1920
Shading Units
192
120
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
