Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1215MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4.666 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +216%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1920
Shading Units
8192
120
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy