NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+103%
4.666 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
1536
120
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
