NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro Plex 2200 S4 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (238W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro Plex 2200 S4
0.622 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
+65%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Plex
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
448
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
238W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
