NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro Plex 2200 D2 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 640W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro Plex 2200 D2
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
+17%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Plex
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
640W
TDP
51W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
