NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro Plex 2100 S4 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 640W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro Plex 2100 S4
0.346 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+284%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Plex
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
128
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
640W
TDP
250W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
