NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
+34%
1.386 TFLOPS
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
238W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
