Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1700MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +1532%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
104
512
Shading Units
6656
32
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

40W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy