NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1354MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+156%
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P620
1294
Quadro K5200
+60%
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P620
356
Quadro K5200
+164%
941
Blender
Quadro P620
130
Quadro K5200
+125%
293
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
