NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1395MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+621%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
56
512
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
