NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2050MHz vs 1354MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+1111%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
