NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1645MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
+130%
12.63 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P6000
+238%
8898
RTX A500 Embedded
2628
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
16
3840
Shading Units
2048
240
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GA107S
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
