NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000
+15687%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 770M
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
4
3840
Shading Units
32
240
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
G96
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
