Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 432.8GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +14%
12.63 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
6144
240
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
350W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy