NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
+1516%
1.196 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
