NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1557MHz vs 924MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
+58%
1.892 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
