Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M +36%
1.627 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1152
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net