NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1747MHz vs 1645MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
+41%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
3840
160
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
