NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1747MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 152W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+1138%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
11
2560
Shading Units
352
160
TMUs
44
64
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
152W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
