NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+3200%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
