NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+1763%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
